The UK cyber security agency asks Apple and other technology companies to disclose encrypted messages exchanged among users.
Officials at the Public Communications Headquarters (GCHQ) suggested a plan to sneak the coded calls to users without threatening their privacy and security.  GCHQ's plan to cancel encrypted messages Falls Flat
Apple, along with other 46 companies, signed a letter and sent it to GCHQ and urged the Security Agency to leave this plan.
] The whole plan to obtain encrypted communications was initiated by two high-ranking cyber security officials in November 2018 (Ian Levy, UK National Technical Director Cyber Security Center, and Crispin Robinson, GCHQ's Crypt Analysis Manager).
If tech companies implement this plan, it would mean that the user's communication on messaging services such as WhatsApp goes to a third receiver (security agencies), except int end-user.
To register their protest, tech firms, civil society groups and Ivy League security experts rejected this proposal from the UK's secret services. Such exercises are a "serious threat" to digital security and fundamental human rights.
Ian Levy and Crispin Robinson said it would be "relatively easy for a service provider to ask a law enforcement party to a group chat or call."
Levy and Robinson attempted to convince technology companies to accept the proposal, as this would be "no more intrusive than the virtual crocodile clips" . In particular, such clips are used in wiretaps of non-encrypted communication.
Technical giants, in their open letter, replied that "to achieve this result, their proposals require two changes to systems that will seriously undermine user safety and trust."
Government as a Participant in Existing Group Chat  This is the first threat that the signatories said, "First, it would require service providers to inject surreptitiously a new public key in a call in response to government demand. This would make a two-way conversion to a group chat where the state is the extra participant, or add a secretly reigning participant to an existing group chat. "
Change in software
Another threat is, " To ensure that the government is added to the conversation secretly, GCHQ's proposal will require messaging programs, service providers and operating systems to change their software so that it would 1) change the encryption systems used and / or 2) misleading users by suppressing the alerts routinely displayed when a new communicator joins a chat. "
Wrapping up …
A company like Apple would never adhere to such intrusive terms set by British security agencies. Apple has always been of great importance to users' privacy and to To protect this, the company had rejected the FBI's request to unlock a terrorist's iPhone.
Do you ever think Apple will destroy users' privacy and security? Share feedback with us On Facebook, Twitter and Telegram. Also make sure to download our app to read other news reports.