Home / Mac / Let them eat R & D: Scary Apple’s chip transition

Let them eat R & D: Scary Apple’s chip transition

who is hungry? Well, muscle up to the buffet because your server from the Forbes contribution network and competitive Chutes and Ladders circuit has just filled all the drawers with huge portions of fear, uncertainty and doubt.

Ewan Spence says “Apple is driving away from the Intel MacBook Pro.” (Tip Nick’s horns.)

That is correct! Dad Tim Cook is going out for cigarettes, and he is will not return. His new family loves him more and looks better, anyway. And refrigerator art? Mmmmwah! No more of your lousy stick figures. And all your crying. Ugh.

… the current MacBook Pro line has reached the end of the line.

Spence continues to repeat this as the “Best if used by”

; date that went out on WWDC, and the fragile Intel-based MacBooks are now useless.

The question of how compatible and usable older apps built for the Intel platform will be when running on the ARM platform has not been publicly demonstrated.

No, it has not been “demonstrated publicly” because so far only developers have Macs based on Apple silicon, and the released devices are not even close to being fully optimized yet. But when references were run and were predictably modest, Steve Troughton-Smith remarked:

So [Developer Transition Kit] with a two year old iPad chip running x8664-code, in emulation, faster than Surface Pro X runs it naturally

Will there be any older apps that do not run as fast as recompiled apps that run naturally? Almost certainly. But there will also be new apps that run faster and do more while using less power. Is this the Mac future we should be afraid of?

Spence writes again about Apple’s transition to its own chips and still fails to mention that Apple has done this several times before, and everything has worked quite well. These concerns made a little more sense when it came to whether developers would not see the value in continuing to support Apple’s platform. But now? Not so much.

As the new platform gathers, developers will shift attention from the older versions to focus on the latest updates on the new platform.

Sure, but it’s also not the case that Apple’s decision on software architecture at Intel never caused this. The transition to just 64 bit and sandbox gave the same problems. Being a developer means balancing the rollout of features. Despite Spence’s concern, the current installed base of Intel-based Macs means no sane developer is going to wake up the day after Apple ships Macs with their own chips and says “It’s Apple silicon just from now on. , sucks! ” You can do that, but you are not going to sell a lot of software that way.

Source link