Mark Gurman ( tweet 9to5Mac):
Apple Inc.'s former head of App Store approvals said he was worried about competition between the company and developers, and even revoked board member Al Gore and ask for a controversial app approval.
Phillip Shoemaker, who ran the app reviews from 2009 to 2016, made the comments in the latest episode of Bloomberg's decrypted podcast in front of Apple's annual developer conference in early June.
It's worth listening to episode.
Apple was always "embarrassed" about the number of developers who support watchOS? That's because no one wants to build apps with WatchKit! And by far the biggest potential Apple Watch software market will always be custom watch faces
James Vincent (Hacker News):
In the interview, Shoemaker says Apple has long feared that competing apps from companies like Google and Facebook would Replace core iOS features such as calling and messaging. He notes that this fear is "absolutely the reason" that the company still does not allow users to set third-party apps as the default service for these primary features.
"It was a real thing. I mean the fear that someone would come together, a Facebook, a Google, anyone and wipe off and remove all of our items," says Shoemaker.
We believe that the competition does everything better and results in the best apps for our customers.
Here are a number of categories we compete for and who we compete with on the App Store.
I've seen a lot of BS from tech companies, but @Apple branding it is @AppStore "A store that welcomes competition" is arguably the biggest bullshit I've seen this year!
Apple: Look at how competitive and open the App Store is!
Also Apple: Here's an infographic of apps that are forced to compete with us in an uneven way game room
I think it is extremely important for everyone to look at Apple's proffered proof of competition consider FaceTime and then release a hearty c huckle of despair
Among the things on the page that made me raise an eyebrow is the segment on how Apple allows competition on Safari in browsers. It's just technically true, since different web recovery engines are blocked from iOS.
Apple apps also access private APIs and daemons, have greater access to public APIs, act as standard apps, and have privileged access to the lock screen, Control Center, and Siri. Nor are they subject to App Review limbo, the common rules for push notifications and subscriptions, or the App Store tax.
That's the case, with 30% tax, you can build something. And what is destroyed is that it scales.
So if your App is very successful, it doesn't even protect you because Apple gets more money to build a competitor.
I actually like the App Review and the review process 👀 But I think there must be external, independent supervision, because the App Store is too important for the community for a person to be the only arbitrator
The five pillars of the Guidelines – Security, Performance, Business, Design and Legal – require applications offered on the App Store to be secure, provide a good user experience, adhere to our privacy policies
Five months ago I wrote about a scammer called "Emanuele Floris", which has an absurdly large number of apps in both iOS and Mac App Store. On the suggestion of someone working for the App Store, I also reported this scam to Apple's App Review via email. And I reported the scammer to Apple Product Feedback. As in this writing of this blog post, these scammers apps are all still in iOS and Mac App Store. No action taken by Apple.
Recently, I found a new huge scam in the Mac App Store. As a Mac developer, I'm primarily concerned with the Mac page. Don't make the mistake of thinking that fraud is primarily a Mac App Store problem. As I said, Emanuele Floris has a large number of apps in the iOS App Store. To learn more about scams in the IOS App Store, have a look at Apps Exposed.
I want the App Store to be safe. I want the App Store to be a great experience. I sell my own apps in the App Store and I hate shoppers being fooled, I hate legitimate developers having to compete with scammers. I hate that Apple sometimes even has scammers in the App Store.
The idea that the App Store is a "safe and reliable" place is also problematic. We know perfectly well that the scams are constantly entering the store, and the tab of "it's safe because it's Apple" actually puts users at risk than if they dealt with everything with suspicion.
84% of apps are free, and developers pay nothing to Apple.
John Gruber ( tweet ):
Any developer who distributes an app through the App Store, free or paid, must pay Apple $ 99 per year for a developer account. You can build apps that use Xcode for free, but you need a paid developer account to distribute them through the App Store.
This was never the case with Mac, before
The $ 99 development fee is the only reason I only developed mobile apps for Android, although I primarily use Apple devices, not because I can't afford it, but because I find a lot of it insulting (the limitations of the sideloader, the trouble of having to rebuild your personal apps regularly, and of course the "added value" of the largely inhospitable development documentation).
] Honestly, I don't think the fee is even daunting to spam programs, since the App Store is already full of them, and the app review process (which is a legend to itself) seems broad beyond the mark there.  Michael Love :
It is a sign of cut throat / disorganized nature of Android indie develops the community that we have not all gathered together now, and started our own open-source App Store with 5% commissions and offered it to OEMs for free.
Stay updated by subscribing to RSS feed for this post.