Home / Apple / New classroom suit revives controversy over iPhone noise

New classroom suit revives controversy over iPhone noise



A new lawsuit filed in California is targeting a former iOS battery management tool that has allegedly hindered the performance of certain devices in the iPhone 6, iPhone 7 and iPhone SE series.

Filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of California, the complaint is the latest in a series of lawsuits against the so-called “battery street” failure from 2017. The complaint arrives the same day as a deadline for filing iPhone owners to file claims in a settlement of $ 500 million reached earlier this year to correct identical complaints.

Discovered shortly after the release of iOS 10.2.1, the iPhone Throttle Issue was traced back to a hardware management tool included in iOS to mitigate the negative effects of aging iPhone batteries. In particular, the software was designed to prevent unexpected shutdowns that were inflicted on certain iPhone 6 and 6s devices, but were well maintained into the life cycle of the iPhone 7.

Release Notes included with the 10.2.1 release status update “Improves power management under peak workloads to avoid unexpected iPhone downtime.” No mention of processor control is made, nor is the management function described in its entirety.

Third-party tests confirmed the presence of an unknown throat process, prompting Apple to apologize to iPhone owners for lack of transparency. To compensate for the alleged indiscretion, the prices of battery replacement without warranty were cut, and the company later introduced a battery health tool that allows users to manually deactivate the throat function.

Nevertheless, the lawsuit flowed in. A total of 61 class action lawsuits were consolidated in April 2018 by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, with Apple finally agreeing to decide in March this year.

The terms of the settlement give members about $ 25 each for their issues. The actual payment will vary depending on the number of claims submitted. Today is the last day to file claims.

With regard to the immediate complaint, which largely reflects those who came before, the plaintiffs allege violations of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, violations of the California Unfair Competition Act, violations of the Data Access and Fraud Act in California and infringement of personal property. Apple is only subject to claims that were not covered during the previous settlement, and there appears to be significant overlap with the current filing.

Today’s lawsuit claims that battery management tools were forced to “camouflage” a “defect” on the iPhone, especially battery designs that were “inadequate because they could not handle the power requirements of the software Apple required users to run.”


Source link