The first anniversary of GDPR, Europe's gold standard law, is later this week – and Microsoft has marked the occasion by supporting Apple's call for a US version.
Microsoft, like Apple, responded at the time by committing GDPR level protection to all its customers globally, but believes voluntary action by technological giants is not enough …
Europe's general data protection regulation has 99 separate articles, but there are four requirements for the law that companies want to store and process your personal data:
- There must be a specific legal reason to process the data
- Personal data must be encrypted
- You are right to a copy of your data
- You can request that your data be deleted
Apple CEO Tim Cook has repeatedly called for a US Federal Privacy Act that will provide equivalent protection to the GDPR, especially in a journal breakdown.
Microsoft has now borrowed its support in a blog post, noting that many other countries have followed Europe's example.
It has inspired a global movement that has seen countries all over the world, adopting new privacy laws modeled on the GDPR. Brazil, China, India, Japan, South Korea and Thailand are among the nations that have passed new laws, proposed new legislation, or are considering changes to existing laws that will bring their privacy regulations closer to the GDPR […]
Anyway How much work companies like Microsoft do to help organizations secure sensitive data and allow individuals to manage their own data, maintain a strong right to privacy, will always be a matter of law falling for governments. Despite the high interest in exercising control over personal data from US consumers, the United States has not yet joined the EU and other nations around the world by implementing national laws describing how people use technology in their lives today […]  Now it's time for Congress to take inspiration from the rest of the world and adopt federal law that extends privacy protection in the GDPR to US citizens.
The company says compatibility with GDPR is crucial.  While federal privacy legislation should reflect US case law and the cultural values and norms of American society, it should also work with the GDPR. For US businesses, interoperability between US law and GDPR will reduce the cost and complexity of compliance by ensuring that companies do not need to build separate systems to meet different and even conflicting privacy requirements in the countries with which they operate.
There is two-sided support for a federal privacy law, but no consensus on the exact approach. In particular, there are different views on the FTC's role.
The democratic notion is that Congress should give the FTC authorities the opportunity to create and enforce privacy rules, while the Republican belief is that the Legislative Department should create the rules, and the FTC should simply be empowered to enforce them.
Is the first anniversary of the GDPR a good time to ask Congress to stop discussing and acting? Is there really a need for separate rules in the United States, or can Congress simply mirror GDRP protection so that exactly the same standards apply? Please let us know your thoughts in the comments.
Check out 9to5Mac on YouTube for more Apple news: