There. I saw it. It should be clear, and it's not likely to happen anytime soon, but we Mac, iPhone and iPad users could use another app store or two. Why? A little competition is a good thing.
Wait. Can't buy Mac programs anywhere on the web? Yes, more or less (caveat emptor; buys passport ). And is there not enough choice in the IOS App Store in iTunes? I mean, there are more than 2 million apps waiting to try and buy. Isn't that enough? No. Here's why.
Unlike presidential campaigns, it has the right choice. Although our current political system in the old A-Ås old has been done with problems that only money seems to solve, the app stores for Apple's products belong to everyone, well … Apple. What's wrong with that picture?
Apple is the godfather of program distribution for Mac, iPhone, iPad, Watch and Apple TV. For the most part, the Big Brother system works well enough and it is difficult to argue that there is not enough competition in the various stores, despite some lawsuits over Apple's so-called app store monopoly.
Over the last decade or two Macs' user base has quadrupled in size, while iOS customers have reached more than 1
We need more app stores.
First, the Mac, because it is an opening and opportunity for Mac app developers to tie together to offer a degree of competition for official Mac App Store. Of course, this type of organization is nothing to do, but by keeping app developer members to a specific set of basic requirements, it can present an alternative to Apple's curated by very limited app store.
Let me offer a few as an example.
Certified – Developers must be certified as an app developer, so customers do not have to jump through hoops to install a third-party application (now happening).
Licensing – Each app sold in the alternative app store should have a license, but what about just a few tiers of use, timeframe and upgrades instead of each app developer using a completely different one licensing. This should also include a built-in serial number associated with a particular Mac user or app store account (my favorite).
Pricing – Developers should be able to praise the application properly, but change the pricing as needed for specific packages and promotions.
Packages – The app store, with approval from specific developers, should be able to package applications into a package for a special price, but for a limited time period.  Renewals and Upgrades – This feature can facilitate some of the subscription models by allowing app developers to create an app available for one or two years, with a refresh or upgrade rate thereafter.  Subscriptions – I am for all programs that have the same options available (although developers can choose which one to use and select the prices for each level) and that includes a subscription rate; monthly or yearly.
Downloads – Personally, I think it's better that all apps and upgrades come from the same source for downloads, although I prefer an installation process that may be less automatic than Apple provides. 19659002] The Store – Currently, app download sites and app developer sites are the norm, but a single point of app visibility – an alternative online store – would be a big plus. Of course, technical issues abound, and developers may work together to create a functional listing of a working store that can list, search, and promote various applications and categories before opening the store to a wider range of developers. Make it work first, then scale.
Of course, there are many more considerations, but this is a fundamental start to creating an alternative means of displaying, marketing and distributing Mac applications. especially those apps that cannot or should not adhere to the inherent limitations of the official Mac App Store.
Secondly, the iPhone and iPad because Apple owns the entire bowl of wax here, and it makes sense that the unofficial alternative Mac App Store show that it can work before entering an iOS version. There are also a number of issues regarding an alternative iOS store, including legality and technical issues that now occur by jailbreaking an iPhone or iPad, although Apple may have successful legal challenges opening the iOS app's distribution process.  This option is the long picture, and it may be entirely dependent on the success of the alternative Mac app store, but may work in accordance with the modest, successful Cydia model that would require a specific installation process to allow non-Apple -approved applications on iOS devices. To be clear, this is a long shot and would require some self-policing from the app developer community. Curation rules, people.
Personally, I'd like to see a little competition for the Mac App Store and the iOS App Store. Apple has the resources and technical chops to make it work, work well, and scale, despite obvious and ongoing issues (searches are unfortunate).
Maybe Google will lend a hand.